Submit manuscript...
eISSN: 2576-4500

Aeronautics and Aerospace Open Access Journal

Research Article Volume 9 Issue 1

Precision & longitudinal measurements of G-D’s physics UNCIARE-JRH critical prediction validate it as the new twenty-first physics paradigm!

Jehonathan Bentovish (Bentwich)

Zefat Academic Center and Ariel University, Israel

Correspondence: Jehonathan Bentovish (Bentwich), Zefat Academic Center and Ariel University, Israel, Tel +972 1-800344544

Received: December 24, 2025 | Published: January 10, 2025

Citation: Bentovish J. Precision & longitudinal measurements of the CUFT’s UNCIARE-JRH critical prediction validate it as the new twenty-first physics paradigm! Aeron Aero Open Access J. 2025;9(1):8‒14. DOI: 10.15406/aaoaj.2025.09.00215

Download PDF

Abstract

Twenty-First Century Theoretical Physics is undergoing a major "Paradigmatic-Shift" from the Old "Material-Causal Random" (MCR) Paradigm underlying both GRT & QM, to the New "G-D's Physics" Scientific Paradigm, based on its proven capacity to: a) resolve the (apparent) "theoretical-inconsistency" between these two GRT & QM "pillars" of the Old MCR Paradigm; and b) offer an alternative (satisfactory) explanation for the accelerated expansion of the physical universe (e.g., to MCR's purely hypothetical assumption of a "Dark-Matter" concept assumed to comprise up to 95% of all the mass in the universe, but which could not experimentally verified for the past two full decades?!) G-D's Physics alternative explanation for the universe's expansion is based upon the discovery of: a singular higher-ordered "Universal Computational/Consciousness Principle" (UCP) that simultaneously computes all exhaustive spatial pixels in the universe at an incredible rate of c2/h = 1.36-50 (sec'!); and the effect of a "Collective Human Consciousness Focus" (CHCF) upon this singular UCP's produced rate of the universe's expansion (e.g., during the "Jewish Rosh Hashanah" [JRH] two days' CHCF); which brings about a "Minute Annual Increase" (MAI)* in the UCP's computed rate of the universe's expansion! Significantly, two (unique) "Critical Predictions" of G-D'S Physics are being validated as more accurate than the corresponding predictions of GRT & QM, thereby leading to the (unequivocal) acceptance of the G-D'S Physics as the New Scientific Paradigm (NSP) for Twenty-First Century Physics – including the empirical validation of the G-D's Physics "Universe's Non-Continuous Increase in its Accelerated Rate of Expansion" at the "JRH" (UNCIARE-JRH) unique "Critical Prediction"! Based on these clear empirical validations of two (unique) G-D's Physics "Critical Predictions" (as more valid than the corresponding predictions of both GRT & QM), two additional (prospective) G-D's Physics "Critical Predictions" are identified, e.g., pertaining to (further) Precision & Longitudinal Measurements of this UNCIARE-JRH prediction, which would also challenge the Old MCR Paradigm's "Big-Bang" Model's assumed age of the universe, and also provide a satisfactory resolution for the (otherwise "unexplained") "Hubble's Tension" Enigma!

Keywords critical predictions, validation, revolutions

Introduction

Twenty-First Century Theoretical Physics has reached a state of a "Paradigmatic-Crisis" akin to the Paradigmatic-Crisis of Newtonian Mechanics that preceded Einstein's Twentieth century's "Paradigmatic Shift" brought about through his discovery (and eventual empirical validation) of "General Relativity Theory" (GRT) as the New Scientific Paradigm of Twentieth Century Physics! This is because, now (as then) there appears to exist a basic "theoretical inconsistency" between the two "pillars" of Twentieth Century's "Material-Causal Random" (MCR) Paradigm, i.e., GRT & QM (e.g., back then, it was between Newtonian Mechanics and Maxwellian Electromagnetic Theory)1-3; Additionally, this "Paradigmatic-Crisis" is signified by a principle inability of the Old (MCR) Paradigm to account for a key major phenomenon in Twenty-First Century Physics, i.e., the accelerated expansion of the universe – assumed to be "caused" by the (purely hypothetical) "Dark-Matter" (concept), which is supposed to comprise up to 95% of all the mass in the universe - but which (nevertheless) could not be detected experimentally for the past two full decades (despite numerous attempts to do so?!)

Based upon Thomas Kuhn's22 (famous) analysis of the "Structure of Scientific Revolutions", we know that following the appearance of such a "Paradigmatic-Crisis", there emerges a (candidate) "New Scientific Paradigm" (NSP) which can:

  1. Resolve the apparent "theoretical inconsistency" between the "pillars" of the Old MCR Paradigm (e.g., GRT & QM).
  2. Offer an alternative (satisfactory) explanation for the (otherwise "unexplained") accelerated expansion of the universe. 4-10

Indeed, such a NSP has been discovered (over the past few year) called: "G-D's Physics"1-19 which has been shown capable of achieving these two objectives; Succinctly stated, this NSP G-D'S Physics was able to resolve the apparent "theoretical inconsistency" between GRT & QM based on the discovery of a singular (higher-ordered) "Universal Computational/Consciousness Principle" (UCP) that simultaneously computes all exhaustive spatial pixels comprising the entire physical universe, i.e., at an incredibly rapid rate of "c2/h" = 1.36-50 (sec'!) thereby producing a series of "Universal Frames" (UF's) 11 comprising the whole physical universe at every "minimal time-point"! The alternative theoretical explanation for the accelerated rate of the universe's expansion is given through G-D's Physics "Universe's Non-Continuous Increase in its Accelerated Expansion" (UNCIARE), e.g., brought about by a "Collective Human Consciousness Focus" (CHCF), such as during the "Jewish Rosh Hashanah's" (JRH) two days special time-interval in which Millions of Jews (all over the world) focus upon this singular (higher-ordered) UCP! 12-17 Hence, the accelerated expansion of the universe's expansion rate is brought about by the JRH-CHCF, which results in a predicted "UNCIARE-JRH" annual increase in the universe's expansion rate! (e.g., rather than is the result of the "purely hypothetical "Dark-Matter" [DM] concept – i.e., which is in fact negated by G-D'S Physics' NSP: a) because this purely hypothetical DM concept failed to be verified experimentally for the past two full decades?! And b) due to "G-D's Physics" newly discovered "Computational Duality Principle" [CDP] which principally negates its existence, based on a computational-empirical analysis! See below). This UNCIARE-JRH annual increase in the universe's expansion rate has been calculated to comprise a "*Minute Annual Increase" (MAI) of 0.000968 km s −1 Mpc " per year; This (novel) G-D's Physics unique "Critical Prediction" of the UNCIARE-JRH's increase of an MAI (e.g., annually) opens an entirely new "window of opportunity" for the validation of the G-D'S Physics NSP – as more valid than the Old MCR Paradigm (e.g., of GRT & QM), i.e., both through: a) "Precise" MAI (sensitive) annual Astronomical measurements "during" the JRH's two days' special time-interval; B) Based on "Longitudinal" Astronomical/Cosmological measurements indicating a "cumulative" increase in the universe's expansion rate over any given "time-interval" (e.g., such as over the past 10, 50 or 100 years, or potentially much longer time-intervals, etc., as delineated below)! 18-21

Indeed, according to Kuhn's22,23 analysis, in order for this NSP G-D'S Physics to be accepted by the (general) Scientific (Physicists & Astronomers/Cosmologists) Community – i.e., as more valid than the Old MCR Paradigm (of GRT & QM), it is necessary for this G-D'S Physics NSP to identify- and empirically validate- at least one (unique) "Critical Prediction", (e.g., such as the abovementioned UNCIARE-JRH prediction), as being more accurate than the corresponding prediction of GRT (or QM)!; As will be delineated (below), this (unique) G-D's Physics UNCIARE-JRH "Critical Prediction" points an MAI (annual) increase in the universe's expansion rate, whereas the Old MCR's GRT's corresponding prediction may only point at a "constant" rate of the universe's expansion! Interestingly, this principle difference between G-D's Physics UNCIARE-JRH MAI (cumulative) increase in the universe's expansion rate and the Old MCR's GRT's "constant rate" of the universe's expansion – may also challenge the Old MCR's GRT's "Big-Bang" assumption regarding the universe's age, as well as offer a satisfactory (new) explanation for the (otherwise "unexplained") "Hubble's Tension" Enigma: i.e., indicating the existence of a significantly observed increase in the universe's expansion rate from its early Cosmological value to the current (increased) Astronomical value of the universe's expansion! This is simply because if the universe's expansion rate increases (annually) based on the JRH's CHCF (two days special time-interval), then we should expect an increase in the universe's expansion – e.g., from its initial Cosmological measure to the current (MAI's cumulative increased) Astronomical measure, e.g., thereby explicating the "Hubble's Tension" Enigma!24

Hence, we stand at a truly "historic turning point", i.e., (most likely) equivalent to Eddington's direct empirical validation of Einstein's "Critical Prediction" (e.g., regarding Mercury's "double-valued" Perihelion's curvature value around the Sun, relative to Newtonian Mechanics predicted value) – which (forever) altered the course of Twentieth Century Physics! This is because, just as in the case of Edington's (famous) 1919's Solar Eclipse empirical validation of Einstein's GRT's (Mercury's "double-valued" Perihelion's) "Critical Prediction" – i.e., as more accurate than the (preceding) Newtonian Mechanics' (corresponding) prediction: which inevitably brought the whole Scientific (Physics) Community to accept Einstein's GRT as the NSP for the Twentieth Century; So (inevitably), the current (unique) "Critical Prediction/s" of G-D's Physics' NSP – e.g., including its (abovementioned) "UNCIARE-JRH" prediction: if validated empirically, as more accurate than the Old MCR's GRT's "constant rate" of the universe's expansion, should (inevitably) lead to the (broad) acceptance of the "G-D'S Physics" as the NSP for Twenty-First Century Theoretical Physics! 25,26

Materials and methods

In order to directly contrast between "G-D'S Physics” NSP (unique) predictions, and the corresponding predictions of the Old (GRT & QM) MCR Paradigm's predictions, "G-D'S Physics" identified two (unique) "Critical-Predictions": A) Relating to the "Universe’s Non-Continuous Increase in Its Accelerated Rate of Expansion" (UNCIARE) due to the “Collective Human Consciousness Focus Hypothesis” (CHCFH) associated with the "Jewish Rosh Hashanah" two days' (New Year’s) special time-interval (e.g., in which Millions of Jews are collectively focusing upon this singular higher-ordered UCP); According to "G-D's Physics" (new) "Collective Human Consciousness Focus Hypothesis" (CHCFH) theoretical postulate, whenever there is a “Collective Human Consciousness Focus” (CHCF), e.g., of a large group of human-beings focusing upon this singular (higher-ordered) “Universal Computational/Consciousness Principle” (UCP – such as during the JRH's (two days' CHCF), then this results in a "Universe’s Non-Continuous Increase in its Accelerated Rate of Expansion" (“UNCIARE”)!27-30 Hence, "G-D's Physics" (unique) UNCIARE-JRH "Critical Prediction" predicts that during the JRH's two days of CHCF, there should occur a “non-continuous" increase in the universe’s accelerated rate of expansion! In contrast, according to the Old MCR GRT’s Paradigm, the (purely hypothetical) concept of DM (e.g., alongside two other "Exceptional Expulsive Events" ["EEE" or factors, delineated below] predicts a "constant-rate" of the universe's expansion – i.e., which could not increase over time! B) A second (unique) "Critical Prediction" of "G-D's Physics" pertains to the (otherwise "unexplained") findings associated with the "Proton-Radius Puzzle" (see below);

Results

  1. Confirmation of G-D'S Physics' "UNCIARE-JRH Critical Prediction"

In order to confirm G-D'S Physics' (unique) "UNCIARE (JRH)" Critical Prediction, it is necessary to "gauge" and compare the rate of the universe's expansion – at it's early (Cosmological) stages, as opposed to the current (Astronomical) rate of the universe's expansion: Once again, according to G-D'S Physics' (unique) "UNCIARE-JRH Critical Prediction", the rate of the universe's expansion should increase at every year's JRH's CHCF two days' (special) time interval – e.g., during which Millions of Jew collectively focus on this singular higher-ordered UCP! Hence, according to G-D's Physics' "UNCIARE-JRH" Critical Prediction, there should occur a "cumulative" increase in the universe's rate of expansion – i.e., from its (early) "Cosmological" measure to the current "Astronomical" measure! Indeed, as indicated (above), this (unique) G-D'S Physics' "UNCIARE-JRH Critical Prediction", e.g., of a (cumulative) overall increase in the universe's rate of expansion rate: from its early Cosmological value to the current Astronomical value – stands in (stark) contrast to the Old MCR's GRT's purely hypothetical "Dark-Matter" prediction regarding the rate of the universe's expansion which should remain constant over time!?

Indeed, the "Hubble's Tension"31-39 empirical findings (unequivocally) supports G-D'S Physics' "UNCIARE-JRH Critical Prediction" regarding such an increase in the rate of the universe's expansion – from the universe's initial Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) measurement rate of expansion indices, e.g., of approximately 67 Kilometers per second per megaparsec – as opposed to 74 kilometers per second per megaparsec in later Astronomical measures of the universe's (contemporary) rate of expansion‎31-39?! In other words, "G-D'S Physics" (unique) "UNCIARE-JRH Critical Prediction", predicting that the Universe's expansion rate will increase (annually) during every consecutive JRH's two days' (special) "Collective Human Consciousness Focus" (CHCF) – is validated by the "Hubble's Tension"31-39 findings! In contrast, these "Hubble's Tension"31-39 findings cannot be explained by the current MCR Paradigm of GRT, which assumes that the universe's accelerated expansion is the result of (purely hypothetical) "Dark Matter" concept, e.g., assumed to comprise up to 95% of all the mass in the universe – but which failed to be detected experimentally over the past twenty years (despite intensive experimental efforts to do so)!? Even beyond that, this (purely hypothetical) "Dark-Matter" concept could not account for the empirically observed "Hubble's Tension"31-39, i.e., because such a (purely hypothetical) DM concept could only account for a "constant-expansion rate" of the universe (e.g., over time), but not for the "Hubble's Tension"31-39 results, e.g., indicating that the universe's rate of expansion increases over time?! In contrast, this (otherwise "unexplained") "Hubble's Tension" Enigma was precisely predicted through G-D's Physics' "UNCIARE Critical Prediction", which therefore (unequivocally) validates G-D's Physics' "UNCIARE-JRH Critical Prediction", as more accurate than the corresponding "constant-expansion rate" prediction of the Old MCR's GRT!

The "Proton-Radius Puzzle" Confirms "G-D'S PHYSICS" Critical Prediction

Pohl et al.27-29 set to measure the radius of a Hydrogen Proton – contrasting between the Standard Hydrogen surrounded by the (negatively charged) electron, and a "Muonic Hydrogen" in which its electron was replaced by a much more massive (negatively charged) "Muon" particle; Surprisingly, they found that the Proton radius was greatly decreased in the Muonic-Hydrogen, than in the Standard Hydrogen – which they termed as the "Proton-Radius Puzzle", because it could not be satisfactorily accounted for by Relativistic or Quantum Models?!

In contrast, these findings conform and validate the unique "Critical-Prediction" of the New "G-D'S PHYSICS" Paradigm stemming from its abovementioned new UCP's computational definition of the "mass" of any given subatomic particle:

M:Σ [ Oi{ o-x,o-y,o-z }  [ UF( n )]=O (i…n{ o-x,o-y,o-z } { UF( i…n ) } / h * n{ UF's( i…n ) } MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbujxzIv3yOvgDG00uaerbd9wD YLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr4rNCHbGeaGqkY=MjYJH8sqFD0xXdHaVhbb f9v8qqaqFr0xc9pk0xbba9q8WqFfea0=yr0RYxir=Jbba9q8aq0=yq =He9q8qqQ8frFve9Fve9Ff0dmeaabaqaciGacaGaaeaadaabaeaafa aakeaaqaaaaaaaaaWdbiaab2eacaqG6aGaaGPaVlaaykW7cqqHJoWu paWaaKGiaeaapeGaae4taiaabMgapaWaaiWaaeaapeGaae4Baiaab2 cacaqG4bGaaeilaiaab+gacaqGTaGaaeyEaiaabYcacaqGVbGaaeyl aiaabQhaa8aacaGL7bGaayzFaaWdbiaabccaa8aacaGLBbGaay5waa WdbiaabwfacaqGgbWdamaabmaabaWdbiaab6gaa8aacaGLOaGaayzk aaGaaeyxa8qacaqG9aGaaGPaVlaab+eacaqGGaWdaiaabIcapeGaae yAaiaabAcicaqGUbWdamaacmaabaWdbiaab+gacaqGTaGaaeiEaiaa bYcacaqGVbGaaeylaiaabMhacaqGSaGaae4Baiaab2cacaqG6baapa Gaay5Eaiaaw2haa8qacaqGGaWdamaacmaabaWdbiaabwfacaqGgbWd amaabmaabaWdbiaabMgacaqGMaIaaeOBaaWdaiaawIcacaGLPaaaai aawUhacaGL9baapeGaaeiiaiaab+cacaqGGaGaaeiAaiaabccacaqG QaGaaeiiaiaab6gapaWaaiWaaeaapeGaaeyvaiaabAeacaqGNaGaae 4Ca8aadaqadaqaa8qacaqGPbGaaeOjGiaab6gaa8aacaGLOaGaayzk aaaacaGL7bGaayzFaaaaaa@83AA@

where the UCP's computational measure of the "mass" value of any given object is computed based on the number of times in which the "Object-consistent" "internal" {o-x,o-y,o-z} values across a given series of UF's frames remains constant (e.g., identical). This is because according to the New G-D'S Physics' UCP's "computational definition" of the "mass" value of any given subatomic particle, a more massive a particle possesses more "spatially-consistent" physical features – therefore leading to G-D's Physics' "Proton-Radius Puzzle's" associated "Critical-Prediction": regarding the (relatively) "more-massive" Muonic Hydrogen Proton possessing a more "spatially-consistent" value, i.e., smaller (and more accurate), than the relatively "less-massive" electron-associated Standard Hydrogen Proton measurements! Hence, the empirically measured "Proton-Radius Puzzle" findings precisely support G-D'S Physics' novel UCP's computational definition of the "mass" of any given particle as a function of its "Object Spatial Consistency" (across a series of UF's Frames); therefore the more "spatially-consistent" measurements of the (relatively more massive "Muon-Hydrogen") than the (relatively less-massive "electron-Hydrogen") was predicted by G-D'S Physics' to lead to a "spatially-smaller"- and spatially more accurate"- measurement of that "Muon-Hydrogen" empirical findings! In contrast, these "Proton-Radius Puzzle" empirical findings could not be accounted for by the Old MCR Paradigm of RT & QM: e.g., despite various attempts to explain this "Proton-Radius Puzzle" findings: the "three-body force"49 , interactions between gravity and the weak force, or a flavour-dependent interaction53,57higher dimension gravity48, a new boson52 , and the quasi-free hypothesis π+51; and therefore constitutes a direct empirical validation of New "G-D'S PHYSICS" Paradigm! Hence, these "Proton-Radius Puzzle" empirical results also (unequivocally) support 'G-D'S Physics' (unique) "Critical Prediction" stemming from its (novel) UCP's computational definition of the "mass" value of any given (subatomic) particle (or relativistic object)!

Discussion

The current empirical results validate at least two (unique) "Critical Predictions" of the G-D'S Physics NSP – as being "more valid" than the corresponding predictions of the Old "Material-Causal Random" (MCR) Paradigm: Specifically, the significant increase in the universe's measured rate of expansion, i.e., from its (initial) Cosmological "Background Radiation" rate to its (current) "Astronomical" (significantly higher) rate of expansion – termed" the "Hubble's Tension"31-39; precisely supports G-D's Physics' assumed "Universe's Non-Continuous Increase in Its Accelerated Rate of Expansion" (UNCIARE-JRH) "Critical Prediction", as more valid than the Old MCR's (GRT's) "constant-expansion rate" corresponding prediction (see Figure 1):

Figure 1 G-D's Phys.UNCIARE & Univ. Age!.

This is because, according to Old MCR's Paradigm's GRT "Big-Bang" Model, the universe's expansion rate should be "constant" – as caused by the assumed initial "Big-Bang" nuclear event (e.g., and two additional "Exceptional Expansive Events" (or factors, EEE's; as delineated below and previously). Specifically, the (purely hypothetical) "Dark Matter" [DM] concept, which is assumed by the Old MCR Paradigm to comprise up to 95% of all the mass in the universe (e.g., but which could not be detected experimentally for the past two decades despite numerous attempts to do so?!) – could only account for such a "constant rate" of the universe's expansion, because the quantity of this purely hypothetical DM is (itself) "constant" (e.g., or may in fact "diminish" over time, hence leading to a deceleration of the universe's expansion rate…) Hence, according to the Old MCR's GRT Model of the universe, the universe has been created 13.8 Billion years ago, and since then its expansion rate should have been "constant" (i.e., as further delineated below through this MCR's assumed three purely hypothetical EEE's). In contrast, according to the G-D's Physics (novel) Scientific Paradigm, there exists a "Universe's non-Continuous Increase in its Accelerated Rate of Expansion" (UNCIARE), which is brought about through the JRH's (two days') "Collective Human Consciousness Focus" (CHCF) upon the singular (higher-ordered) "Universal Computational/Consciousness Principle" (UCP) which increases the universe's rate of expansion by a Minute Annual Increase (MAI) (i.e., of 0.000968 km s −1 Mpc (during the JRH's two days' time-interval!) Hence, the existence of this (specific JRH associated) CHCF is seen as "critical" for the continuous (cumulative) increase in the universe's "accelerated" expansion rate, which also points at the G-D's Physics "Six Days Creation Model" (delineated previously) highlighting the centrality of this CHCF as a key (essential and necessary) factor for the empirically observed "UNCIARE" (e.g., otherwise "unexplained") increase in the universe's expansion rate! Consequently, the G-D'S PHYSICS introduces an entirely different account of the universe's (stipulated) age (and "origin") of the physical universe, e.g., to be derived from the MAI's predicted (annual increase) in the universe's expansion rate: originated 5785 years ago!

Therefore, the current article provides initial (unequivocal) empirical support for the G-D's Physics UNCIARE's (unique) "Critical Prediction" regarding the (cumulative) MAI's increase in the universe's expansion rate – i.e., producing the otherwise ("unexplained") "Hubble's Tension"! This is (once again) because unlike GRT's "Big-Bang" Model which assumes a "constant" rate of the universe's expansion (e.g., and the universe's creation based on an initial "Big-Bang" nuclear event dated 13.8 Billion years ago) – leading to an "unexplained" "Hubble's Tension" Enigma which cannot account for a significant increase in the universe's expansion rate over time; the (novel) G-D'S PHYSICS explains the universe's (continuous) "origination" by that (singular, higher-ordered) UCP, based on its continuous computation- "dissolution" "re-computation" and "evolution"- of every exhaustive spatial pixel (e.g., simultaneously), at an incredible rate of "c2/h" = 1.36-50 sec'! thereby leading to the UCP's production of an incredibly rapid series of "Universal Frames" (UF's) comprising the entire physical universe at every such "minimal time-point"! Indeed, according to this (entirely new) conception of the universe's (constant and continuous) "origination-" "dissolution"- "re-computation"- and "development"- by this singular (higher-ordered) UCP; and the (abovementioned) centrality of the human CHCF (e.g., during the JRH's two days' special time-interval), which brings about an annual "MAI" increase in the UCP's rate of the universe's expansion rate – leads to the G-D's Physics (clear and unique) "Critical Prediction" of "UNCIARE", which is empirically validated- by the (otherwise "unexplained" by the Old MCR's GRT "Big-Bang Model)! Indeed, it is due to the G-D's Physics centrality of the JRH (two days') CHCF (time-interval) – and specifically the MAI's (cumulative) increase in the universe's expansion rate (over time), that the G-D's Physics stipulated age of the physical universe is only 5785 (rather than the Big-Bang Model's stipulated 13.8 Billion years!  

In order to further support this (novel) G-D's Physics UCP's CHCF (JRH's) model of the universe's UNCIARE increase (over time), we highlight its (conceptual computational) negation of the Old MCR's Big-Bang Model of a "constantly" expanding universe: According to the Old MCR Paradigm's GRT "Big-Bang" Model, the universe's current rate of expansion can be explained based on three "Exceptional Expansive Events" (or factors, EEE's): 1) Initial "Big-Bang" Event: the creation of the entire physical universe based on an initial nuclear event. 2) Cosmological Factor: exceptional ("unexplained") anti-gravitational effect that is causing the universe's constant-rate increase in its expansion rate. 3) Purely hypothetical ("unexplained") "Dark-Matter" Concept: that is assumed (somehow) to "cause" an increase in the universe's expansion!? However, even beyond the (perplexing) failure of Astronomers to experimentally detect the actual existence of this (purely hypothetical) "Dark-Matter" concept (for the past twenty years!?) even from a theoretical standpoint, this (purely hypothetical) Dark Matter (DM) concept – could not account for an increase in the universe's expansion rate!? This is because even if there existed such a (purely hypothetical) DM concept (or element) – assumed to (somehow) "push" the outer-galactic elements in the universe, it could only do so at a "constant-rate", e.g., because it's quantity cannot increase over time! This means that over time, the rate of the universe's expansion could only remain constant – or (much more likely) decrease!

In fact, the very (computational) structure of GRT's (three) "Exceptional Expansive Effects" (EEE's), e.g., (1) "Big-Bang" event; (2) "Cosmological Factor"; (3) "Dark-Matter" – all share two (very important) characteristics:

  1. These three EEE's are based on the Old "Material-Causal Random" (MCR) Paradigm's basic "Self-Referential Computational System" (SRCS) structure; which has been shown by the G-D's Physics "Computational Duality Principle" (CDP) to be "computationally flawed", i.e., lead to an inevitable "logical-inconsistency" and (ensuing) "computationally-indeterminacy", and are therefore negated by the CDP (as "invalid")!
  2. These three EEE's can only account for a "constant rate" of the universe's expansion (e.g., or more likely a "decreasing rate" of the universe's expansion) "over time" – but cannot account for an "increased rate" of the universe's expansion over time!?

Indeed, when we examine each of these three EEE's (e.g., individually), we can see that none of them can account for an "increasing rate" of the universe's expansion: a) The "Big-Bang" (initial) nuclear event cannot account for an increasing rate of the universe's expansion, since the initial "impetus" of the Big-Bang's nuclear explosion necessarily pushes the universe's outer galactic elements at a certain "constant" rate, (e.g., or more likely will decrease over time) but will not "increase" over time! b) The "Cosmological Constant" – despite it being "unexplainable": e.g., there is no "etiological" physical explanation for its repulsive effect, or the nature of such an effect; in any event such an "axiomatic repulsive effect" must also be "constant"! This is due to the fact that this "Cosmological Constant" has been defined as "constant"! c) "Dark-Matter" (DM): this purely hypothetical DM – despite the fact that it could not be detected experimentally (for the past twenty years, despite numerous attempts to do so!?) could only "push" those outer galactic regions in a "constant" (e.g., or more likely a "decreasing" rate) over time; this i.e., because, once again, unless this "DM" could somehow "increase in quantity" (over time), its effect could not "increase" over time!    

Indeed, an examination of the SRCS Computational Structure of each of these three EEE's has revealed that they all share the same basic SRCS' (intrinsic) "computational flaw", which is exposed through the CDP – and points at the inevitable existence of of a singular higher-ordered "Universal Computational Principle" (UCP), which according to the G-D'S PHYSICS (simultaneously) computes all exhaustive spatial points in the universe Paradigm at the "unfathomable" rate of c2/h = 1.36-50 (sec')!

The "Computational Duality Principle" (CDP) Negation of the GRT's SRNCS Structure!

According to G-D's Physics' "Computational Duality Principle" Postulate, the basic "Computational Structure" of GRT's Old "Material-Causal" Paradigm, e.g., termed: a "Self-Referential Negative Computational System" (SRNCS) is "computationally flawed", i.e., it inevitably leads to both "logical-inconsistency" and ensuing "computational indeterminacy" – which are contradicted by GRT's Computational System's proven empirical capacity to determine the accelerated rate of the universe's expansion, thereby pointing at the singular higher-ordered UCP that simultaneously computes all exhaustive spatial pixels in the universe! Specifically, the GRT's SRNCS Computational Structure assumes that it is solely based on the direct physical interactions (di) between GRT's basic "Curved Space-Time" (due to the presence of certain "massive-objects") "Contractive-Stable Universe" [C-STMo : CSU], e.g., describing a universe that is fundamentally "contracting" or being "stable" (i.e., "constant"); and the three (abovementioned) EEE's "expulsive-effects", e.g.: BB, CC, and DE – all describing a (constant) "accelerated-expansion" of the universe produces such a SRNCS Computational Structure:

GRT's SRNCS:

PR{ [ C-STMo : CSU ][ EEE-BB, CC, DE/DM ] }  "Not C-STMo : CSU" / di ?! MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbujxzIv3yOvgDG00uaerbd9wD YLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr4rNCHbGeaGqkY=MjYJH8sqFD0xXdHaVhbb f9v8qqaqFr0xc9pk0xbba9q8WqFfea0=yr0RYxir=Jbba9q8aq0=yq =He9q8qqQ8frFve9Fve9Ff0dmeaabaqaciGacaGaaeaadaabaeaafa aakeaaqaaaaaaaaaWdbiaabcfacaqGsbWdamaacmaabaWaamWaaeaa peGaae4qaiaab2cacaqGtbGaaeivaiaab2eacaqGVbGaaeiiaiaabQ dacaqGGaGaae4qaiaabofacaqGvbaapaGaay5waiaaw2faa8qacaqG SaGaaeiia8aadaWadaqaa8qacaqGfbGaaeyraiaabweacaqGTaGaae OqaiaabkeacaqGSaGaaeiiaiaaboeacaqGdbGaaeilaiaabccacaqG ebGaaeyraiaab+cacaqGebGaaeytaaWdaiaawUfacaGLDbaaaiaawU hacaGL9baapeGaaeiiaiablgAjxjaabccacaqGIaGaaeOtaiaab+ga caqG0bGaaeiiaiaaboeacaqGTaGaae4uaiaabsfacaqGnbGaae4Bai aabccacaqG6aGaaeiiaiaaboeacaqGtbGaaeyvaiaabkcacaqGGaGa ae4laiaabccacaqGKbGaaeyAaiaabccacaqG=aGaaeyiaaaa@72AE@

Wherein it is assumed that GRT's fundamentally assumed "Contractive-Stable Universe" (e.g., due to the curvature of Space-Time by certain "massive objects") : [C-STMo : CSU] seems to both "exist" and "Not exist" at the same "di" computational level, e.g., constituting a basic "logical-inconsistency" and associated "computational indeterminacy" implying an (apparent) inability of such a SRNCS System to determine the "existence" or "non-existence" of this {[C-STMo : CSU]!? But, since empirically the universe is in fact expanding (at an accelerated rate!), e.g., "Not {[C-STMo : CSU]"; therefore, according to the CDP there must exist a singular higher-ordered UCP that simultaneously computes all exhaustive spatial pixels comprising the entire physical universe (for each UF's at the rate of "c2 /h" = 1.36-50 sec')!

Precision & Longitudinal Measurements of the Universe's UNCIARE-JRH Expansion Could Resolve the "Hubble's Tension" Enigma!

The significance of this important (seminal) article, is its call for Astronomers to measure and validate the G-D's Physics UNCIARE-JRH (unique) Critical Prediction, which could resolve the "Hubble's Tension" Enigma: This is because the "Hubble's Tension"31-39 Enigma pertains to the unexplained increase in the universe's rate of expansion - from its initial "Background Radiation" Cosmological rate to the current Astronomical (increased) rate of expansion?! However, according to the (empirically validated) New G-D'S PHYSICS Scientific Paradigm (for the Twenty-First Century), this "unexplained" "Hubble's Tension" is due to the UCP's UNCIARE-JRH effect, i.e., a "non-continuous" annual increase in the universe's rate of expansion that is associated with the "Collective Human Consciousness Focus" (CHCF) occurring during the "Jewish Rosh Hashanah" (JRH) two days' of CHCF! Indeed, according to the G-D'S PHYSICS, the "Hubble's Tension" – is really only a manifestation of the cumulative increase of the UCP's UNCIARE-JRH over the entire span of the universe's time of existence! Therefore, an "International Scientific Contest for Validation of the G-D's Physics UNCIARE's Critical Prediction & Resolution of the Hubble's Tension Enigma" has called for Astronomers and Cosmologists to test and validate the G-D's Physics UNCIARE-JRH unique Critical Prediction (see Announcement, below): Specifically, to empirically validate the existence of an Minute Annual Increase (MAI) in the universe's expansion rate (associated with the universe's stipulated age associated with the 'Six Day Creation Model' (SCDM), which has been justified based on the centrality of the CHCF previously). TO the extent that the precise MAI value predicted by the G-D's Physics UNCIARE-JRH Critical Prediction is empirically validated, then this would provide an unequivocal support fort the G-D's Physics UCP's associated CHCF "SDCM" as more valid than the Old MCR GRT's "Big-Bang" Model of the universe's origination and development!

As delineated previously (e.g., in a previous article entitled: "G-D'S Physics Complete Unification of Quantum & Relativistic Models, Four Basic Physical Features & 'Hubble's Tension' Resolution!", whose modified Announcement is posted below), the precise measurement of G-D'S PHYSICS' "UNCIARE-JRH" Critical Prediction" comprises: a (higher-precision*) Astronomical Measurement of the UNCIARE-JRH's Critical Prediction of an increase in the current Astronomical Value of the Universe's Expansion Rate, by a "*Minute Annual Increase" (MAI) of 0.000968 km s −1 Mpc, e.g., during the JRH's two days' time-interval (that occurred in 2024 on Oct. 3rd -4th), relative to the rate of the universe's expansion prior to Oct. 3rd – 4th, 2024 (and that was predicted to carry through until the next JRH: Sep. 22nd-23rd , 2025 )– in which another MAI of 0.000968 km s −1 Mpc will be added to the universe's accelerated rate of expansion!

Indeed, a second manner for validating the G-D's Physics New Twenty-First Century's Scientific Paradigm's (unique) UNCIARE-JRH is based on a Longitudinal measurement of the same UNCIARE-JRH's cumulative MAI's – across any given time-span! Thus, for instance, this second manner of testing (and validating) the G-D's Physics UNCIARE-JRH Critical Prediction could be experimentally tested at particularly set "time-points", e.g., for instance: a) Before 10 years (e.g., 2014 after the JRH of 2014): a predicted 10 * MAI = 10 *MAI of 0.000968 km s −1 Mpc decrease from the current Hubble's constant, i.e., ; b) Before 50 years (e.g., (e.g., 2014 after the JRH of 2014): a predicted 10 X MAI = 50 * MAI of 0.000968 km s −1 Mpc decrease from the current Hubble's constant, c) Before 100 years : a predicted 100 X MAI = MAI of 0.000968 km s −1 Mpc decrease from the current Hubble's constant.

Obviously, the combination of these two: "Precision"- & "Longitudinal"- measures of the G-D's Physics UNCIARE-JRH's Critical Prediction, when empirically validated, will provide an unequivocal support and validation of the G-D'S PHYSICS as the New (satisfactory) Twenty-First Century Scientific Paradigm (e.g., as more valid than the Old MCR Paradigm's GRT & QM)!

Hence, we truly stand at a "historic pivotal turning point" in the development of Twenty-First Century Theoretical Physics (and in fact Science, more generally)! This is because there are already two clear (unique) Critical Predictions of the New G-D's Physics Scientific Paradigm that have been validated as more valid than the corresponding predictions of both GRT & QM, including: a) the "Proton Radius Puzzle" findings. b) The UNCIARE-JRH associated findings explaining the "Hubble's Tension" Enigma based on a cumulative MAI's increase (e.g., occurring annually at the JRH's two days CHCF special time-interval and continuing throughout the entire subsequent Jewish Year). Beyond that, the current article calls Astronomers and Cosmologists to validate (with an even with a greater precision) this UNCIARE-JRH (unique) "Critical Prediction"- i.e., pertaining both to: a) A precise (single) MAI increase in the current Hubble's Constant that should be measured exactly at each "Jewish Rosh Hahsnah's" (JRH) annual two-days' time-interval (and carrying over throughout the entire subsequent Jewish year: this year it occurred during October 3rd-4th , 2024). b) A Longitudinal Cumulative Measurement of the accumulated number of MAI's for any given particular span of time (e.g., as noted above: for 10- 50- or 100- years' time spans). At is stands (currently), the two abovementioned direct empirical validations of the G-D's Physics (unique) two Critical Predictions as more valid than the corresponding predictions of the Old MCR (GRT's & QM's) substantiate this G-D'S PHYSICS as the New Scientific Paradigm for the Twenty-First Century!

Nevertheless, the called for precision and longitudinal measurements of the G-D's Physics UNCIARE-JRH will provide an even more accurate ascertainment pf the G-D's Physics "Six-Day Creation Model" (SDCM) and its associated (key) "Collective Human Consciousness Focus" (CHCF) as central to the origination- development- and (in fact) "Ultimate Geulah Perfected Goal" State of the entire physical universe! This is because to the extent that these (more specific) Precision & Longitudinal Measurements of the UNCIARE-JRH Critical Predictions will be validated empirically, then this will (unequivocally) support the New G-D'S PHYSICS Scientific Paradigm, indicating that the origination- sustenance- and development- of the entire physical universe is totally dependent upon that singular higher-ordered "Universal Computational/Consciousness Principle" (UCP) that simultaneously computes all exhaustive spatial pixels at the incredible rate of "c2/h" = 1.36-50 (sec')! Moreover, according to this New Twenty-First Century Scientific Paradigm the whole origination- sustenance- dynamics- and development- of the entire physical universe has been "pre-planned" by this singular higher-ordered UCP to develop from an initial "inanimate" matter through "animate": plants, animals and human-beings towards attaining a Perfected Geulah Goal" State of Humanity in which Science (and the whole of Humanity) will recognize this singularity of the UCP, and its characterization by such "intrinsic-sublime" properties as: "All-Goodness", "Morality", "Peace" and "Harmony" – which will therefore also characterize the existence and behavior of the whole of Humanity! Therefore, the current (truly) "historic-pivotal turning point" associated with the direct empirical validation of the G-D'S PHYSICS as more valid than both GRT & QM (e.g., and in fact completely unifying between them, as well as for the first time in Physics between the Four basic Physical Features: of "time", "space", "energy" and "mass", as well as between the Four basic Forces!)  is not "limited" only to the sphere of Twenty-First Century Theoretical Physics, or even Science (more generally), but in fact represents a Major Turning Point (and even "Apex") in the whole development of Humanity and the entire physical universe, i.e., since it points at the "fulfillment" of the UCP's "pre-planned" "Ultimate Perfected Geulah Goal" of the entire physical universe, in which the whole of Humanity (finally) recognizes) this singular higher-ordered UCP, and lives accordingly in complete Peace & Harmony!

Hence, it may be appropriate to end this (significant) article with Maimonides' ("prophetic") description of the state of Humanity during this (predicted) "Perfected Geualh State":

Intriguingly then, "G-D'S PHYSICS" points at Humanity's (current) entering of the "Ultimate Perfected Geulah State" is extremely reminiscent of the Isaiah's (well-known) Prophecy: And they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruning hooks; nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war anymore…  (Isaiah 2:4) And the Great Maimonides' prophecy regarding "That time (of Geulah) there will be no hunger or war, jealousy or competition… and the whole World's preoccupation will be only to know "G-D"! (Hilchut Melachim, 12:3-5).

Announcement of G-D's Physics Call for Astronomers to Validate the UNCIARE-JRH "Critical Prediction Through Precise & Longitudinal Measurements!

A call is made to all leading Astronomers, Cosmologists and Universities to collaborate with Dr. Bentovish (e.g., directly through his personal email: drbentwich@gmail.com) in validating two additional (prospective unique) "Critical Predcitions" comprising:

  1. Precise Astronomical Measurement of the UNCIARE-JRH's Critical Prediction: of an increase in the current Astronomical Value of the Universe's Expansion Rate, i.e., by a "*Minute Annual Increase" (MAI) of 0.000968 km s −1 Mpc that occurred during the last JRH: on Oct. 3rd -4th, 2024 (e.g., relative to the measured rate of the universe's expansion prior to Oct. 3rd- 4th 2024; with this increased MAI value carrying over through the whole next JRH – until the next JRH scheduled for Sep. 22nd & 23rd, 2025); "G-D's Physics" therefore also predicts a further (singular) MAI increase in the rate of the universe's expansion beginning from these two (prospective) days of the next JRH (Sep. 22nd & 23rd , 2025) of another 0.000968 km s −1 Mpc increase in the universe's expansion rate (e.g., that will carry through the whole next JRH)!
  2. Longitudinal measurement of the (same) UNCIARE-JRH's cumulative MAI's – across any given time-span! Thus, for instance, this second manner of testing (and validating) the G-D's Physics UNCIARE-JRH Critical Prediction could be experimentally tested at particularly set "time-points", e.g., for instance: a) Before 10 years (e.g., 2014 after the JRH of 2014): a predicted 10 * MAI = 10 *MAI of 0.000968 km s −1 Mpc "decrease" from the current Hubble's constant, i.e., ; b) Before 50 years (e.g., (e.g., 2014 after the JRH of 2014): a predicted 10 X MAI = 50 * MAI of 0.000968 km s −1 Mpc decrease from the current Hubble's constant, c) Before 100 years : a predicted 100 X MAI = MAI of 0.000968 km s −1 Mpc decrease from the current Hubble's constant.

Dedication:

On this special day of the Seventh Light of Chanukah (written in the Israeli "Givulim" settlement, next to Gaza strip), I would like to dedicate this special article to the "Alter Rabbi", Rabbi Schneur Zalman, for his (famous) י'ט כסלו (תשפ"ה) (19th of Kislev(5785  special (holy) day (e.g., considered as the "Rosh Hashanah" of the Chassidic Year!); due to the great "Light" that he brought to the world alongside the other Heads of the Jewish People (including the Ball Shem Tuv, and the Lubavitcher Rabbi) – all leading Humanity (and the world) to its ultimate "Perfected Geulah State", which the New G-D'S Physics Twenty-First Century is pointing at! I would also like to dedicate this special article to my dear beloved (diseased) mother, Dr. Tirzah Bentwich, and my dear beloved wife (( תל"חא, Shulamit Bentovish. * After revisions, this article is being submitted for publication of the special day of 10th of Tevet (fast) day, which may "G-D willing" be transformed to a (happy) "holiday", based on the fulfillment of the "Geulah Perfected State" of Humanity (and Science), based on the discovery- and empirical validation- of the G-D's Physics' New Scientific Paradigm for the Twenty-First Century! This article must also be dedicated to three other Great Heads of the Jewish People: the Great "RASHBI" (Rabi Shimon Bar-Yochai) who wrote the (hole) "Zohar" Book which led to all of the Chassidic outpouring of the Inner Wisdom of the Holy Torah; the Great Maimonides (whose passing date is celebrated tomorrow, Kaf Tevet!); and to the Great "Alter-Rabbi" (Rabbi Shneur-Zalman) whose passing date is also celebrated this upcoming Friday (Kaf-dalet Tevet) – who brought down the Holy Tanyah Book which is the basis of all Chabad Chassidic Holy Books.

Acknowledgments

None.

Conflicts of interest

The author declares that there are no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Bentwich J. Harmonizing quantum mechanics and relativity theory. Theoretical Concepts of Quantum Mechanics. 2012;515–550.
  2. Bentwich J. Theoretical validation of the computational unified field theory. Theoretical Concepts of Quantum Mechanics. 2012;551–598.
  3. Bentwich J. The theoretical ramifications of the computational unified field theory. Advances in Quantum Mechanics. 2013;671–882.
  4. Bentwich J. The computational unified field theory (CUFT): a candidate theory of everything. Advances in Quantum Mechanics. 2013;395–436.
  5. Bentwich J. The computational unified field theory (CUFT): a candidate 'theory of everything'. Selected Topics in Application of Quantum Mechanics.
  6. Bentwich J. On the geometry of space, time, energy, and mass: empirical validation of the computational unified field theory. Unified Field Mechanics: Natural Science Beyond the Veil of Spacetime. 2015.
  7. Bentwich, J. The computational unified field theory: a paradigmatic shift. Research & reviews: Journal of Pure & Applied Physics. 2016.
  8. Bentwich J. The computational unified field theory: could ‘dark matter’ & ‘dark energy’ be “superfluous? Sci Fed Journal of Quantum Physics. 2017.
  9. Bentwich J. The computational unified field theory: explaining the universe from “without”. SciFed Journal of Quantum Physics Special Issue.
  10. Bentwich J. The computational unified field theory (cuft): redefining mass, gravity & the physical universe. The Global Journal of Science Frontier Research. 2019;19(6).
  11. Bentwich J. Astronomical validation of the computational unified field theory (cuft) "critical prediction" & resolution of the "universe's accelerated expansion rate enigma" (UAERE). The Global Journal of Science Frontier Research. 2019;19(6).
  12. Bentwich J. Urgent call for empirical validation of the computational unified field theory’s (cuft) new 21st century ‘a-causal computation’ (ACC) Paradigm. Acta Scientific Applied Physics. 2019;1(1).
  13. Bentovish J. An urgent need for "cuft" new 21st century paradigm's empirical validation. Advances in Theoretical & Computational Physics. 2020b;3(2):59-65.
  14. Bentovish J. "CUFT: A new scientific paradigm for the twenty-first century. I Universe. 2021.
  15. Bentovish J. "CUFT": From arbitrary physical & biological "evolution" towards a universal consciousness reality's (ucr) directed morally-perfected ("geulah") universe! in world journal of pharmaceutical & medical research. "CUFT New Twenty-First Century Scientific Paradigm: Empirical & Theoretical Ramifications. 2021.
  16. Bentovish J. "CUFT": On the true nature of "dark-energy" & "dark-matter". In world journal of pharmaceutical & medical research. "CUFT New Twenty-First Century Scientific Paradigm: Empirical & Theoretical Ramifications.
  17. Bentovish J. The new "CUFT" new twenty-first century paradigm: a morally perfected ("geulah") directed new physical universe! In world journal of pharmaceutical & medical research. "CUFT New Twenty-First Century Scientific Paradigm: Empirical & Theoretical Ramifications. 2021.
  18. Bentovish J. "CUFT" New 21st century paradigm: a complete integration of "space" & "energy", "mass" & "time"! In world journal of pharmaceutical & medical research. "CUFT New Twenty-First Century Scientific Paradigm: Empirical & Theoretical Ramifications. 2021.
  19. Bentovish J. "CUFT": Complete unification of the four basic forces of nature & "geulah"! In world journal of pharmaceutical & medical research. "CUFT New Twenty-First Century Scientific Paradigm: Empirical & Theoretical Ramifications. 2021.
  20. Dahia F, Lemos AS. Is the proton radius puzzle evidence of extra dimensions? Hep-ph. 2016;76(8):435.
  21. Karr JP, Hilico L. (2012). Why three-body physics does not solve the proton-radius puzzle. Phys Rev Lett. 2012;109(10):103401.
  22. Kuhn Thomas S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.University of Chicago Press. 1962;1st Ed:1–222.
  23. Lestone JP. Muonic atom Lamb shift via simple means (Report). Los Alamos Report. Los Alamos National 2017; Laboratory. LA-UR-17-29148.
  24. Liu Y, McKeen D, Miller GA. Electrophonic Scalar Boson and Muonic Puzzles. Phys Rev Lett. 2016;117(10):101801.
  25. Onofrio R. Proton radius puzzle and quantum gravity at the Fermi scale. Hep-Ph. 2013;104(2):1–6.
  26. Aghanim, N, Akrami Y, Ashdown M, et al. Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters. Astro-Ph.CO. 2020;1–73.
  27. Pohl R, Antognini A, Nez F, et al. The size of the proton (PDF). Nature. 2010;466(7303):213–216.
  28. Pohl R, Antognini A, Nezet F, et al. Laser spectroscopy of muonic deuterium. Science. 2016;353(6300):669–673.
  29. Pohl R. Proton-radius puzzle deepens. 2016.
  30. Zyga, Lisa. Proton radius puzzle may be solved by quantum gravityorg. 2013.
  31. Riess AG, Casertano S, Yuan W, et al. Is there any measurable redshift dependence on the SN Ia absolute magnitude? 2018.
  32. Riess AG, Yuan W, Macri LM, et al. A comprehensive measurement of the local value of the hubble constant with 1 km s−1 mpc−1 uncertainty from the hubble space telescope and the SH0ES Team. Astro-Ph.CO. 2022;1–68.
  33. Riess AG, Gagandeep SA, Yuan W, et al. Crowded no more: the accuracy of the hubble constant tested with high resolution observations of cepheids by JWST. Astro-Ph.CO. 2024;1–20.
  34. Shajib AJ, Birrer S, Treu T, et al. Strides: a 3.9 per cent measurement of the Hubble constant from the strong lens system DES J0408−5354. Astro-Ph.CO. 2020;494(4):6072–6102.
  35. Scolnic D, Rest A, Riess A, et al. Systematic uncertainties associated with the cosmological analysis of the first pan-starrs1 type 1a supernova sample. Astro-Ph.CO. 2014;3824(2):1–24.
  36. Verde L, Schöneberg N, Marín HG. A tale of many H0. Astro-Ph.CO. 2023;1–54.
  37. Wong KC, Suyu SH, Chen GCF, et al. H0LiCOW – XIII. A 2.4 per cent measurement of H0 from lensed quasars: 5.3σ tension between early- and late Universe probes. MNRAS. 2020;498(1):1420.
  38. Kamionkowski M, Riess AG. The hubble tension energy and early dark energy. Ann Rev Nucl Part Sci. 2022;1–34.
  39. Hu JP, Wang FY. Hubble tension: the evidence of new physics. Universe. 2023;9(2):94.
Creative Commons Attribution License

©2025 Bentovish. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.